These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20703608)

  • 21. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimization of wavelet decomposition for image compression and feature preservation.
    Lo SC; Li H; Freedman MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1141-51. PubMed ID: 12956269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An efficient wavelet and curvelet-based PET image denoising technique.
    Bal A; Banerjee M; Sharma P; Maitra M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Dec; 57(12):2567-2598. PubMed ID: 31654293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust non-homomorphic approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images.
    Gupta S; Chauhan RC; Saxena SC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Mar; 43(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 15865126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiresolution edge detection using enhanced fuzzy c-means clustering for ultrasound image speckle reduction.
    Tsantis S; Spiliopoulos S; Skouroliakou A; Karnabatidis D; Hazle JD; Kagadis GC
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072903. PubMed ID: 24989413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adaptive wavelet packet-based de-speckling of ultrasound images with bilateral filter.
    Esakkirajan S; Vimalraj CT; Muhammed R; Subramanian G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2463-76. PubMed ID: 24063964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis.
    Mahersia H; Boulehmi H; Hamrouni K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():46-62. PubMed ID: 26831269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image denoising based on wavelets and multifractals for singularity detection.
    Zhong J; Ning R
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2005 Oct; 14(10):1435-47. PubMed ID: 16238050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study.
    Sivaramakrishna R; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Cardenosa G; Powell KA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10882244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
    Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wavelet denoising of displacement estimates in elastography.
    Techavipoo U; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):477-91. PubMed ID: 15121250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A case study on medical image enhancement based on II curvelet.
    Qi G; Fei S; Shu-ting S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26(3-4):129-38. PubMed ID: 26684885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding.
    Kom G; Tiedeu A; Kom M
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jan; 37(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16487954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wavelet Transform and Texton based Analysis for Detection of Benign and Malignant Masses.
    Bhowmick C; Dutta PK; Mahadevappa M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2178-2181. PubMed ID: 33018438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.
    Dheeba J; Albert Singh N; Tamil Selvi S
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Jun; 49():45-52. PubMed ID: 24509074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiresolution bilateral filtering for image denoising.
    Zhang M; Gunturk BK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Dec; 17(12):2324-33. PubMed ID: 19004705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiscale image denoising using goodness-of-fit test based on EDF statistics.
    Naveed K; Shaukat B; Ehsan S; Mcdonald-Maier KD; Ur Rehman N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216197. PubMed ID: 31075113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.