These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20703608)

  • 41. Noise reduction for magnetic resonance images via adaptive multiscale products thresholding.
    Bao P; Zhang L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1089-99. PubMed ID: 12956264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
    Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The study of medical image enhancement based on curvelet.
    Guo Q; Su X
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S319-23. PubMed ID: 26410498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Feature and contrast enhancement of mammographic image based on multiscale analysis and morphology.
    Wu S; Yu S; Yang Y; Xie Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():716948. PubMed ID: 24416072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using wavelet denoising and mathematical morphology in the segmentation technique applied to blood cells images.
    Boix M; Cantó B
    Math Biosci Eng; 2013 Apr; 10(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 23458301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Wavelet domain non-linear filtering for MRI denoising.
    Anand CS; Sahambi JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 28(6):842-61. PubMed ID: 20418039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Yoshida H; Doi K; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Schmidt RA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 8796725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Wavelet-domain TI Wiener-like filtering for complex MR data denoising.
    Hu K; Cheng Q; Gao X
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 34(8):1128-40. PubMed ID: 27238055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests.
    Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):709-727. PubMed ID: 28582938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography.
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bollow M; Hermann KG; Richter K; Heinlein P; Schneider W; Hamm B
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 15191095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adaptive image denoising using scale and space consistency.
    Scharcanski J; Jung CR; Clarke RT
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(9):1092-101. PubMed ID: 18249730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Efficient Denoising Framework for Mammogram Images with a New Impulse Detector and Non-Local Means.
    Rajaguru H; S R SC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jan; 21(1):179-183. PubMed ID: 31983182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Wavelet-based statistical approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images.
    Gupta S; Chauhan RC; Sexana SC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 15125148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bayesian wavelet-based image denoising using the Gauss-Hermite expansion.
    Rahman SM; Ahmad MO; Swamy MN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1755-71. PubMed ID: 18784025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multiplexed wavelet transform technique for detection of microcalcification in digitized mammograms.
    Mini MG; Devassia VP; Thomas T
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 15692872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
    Hindle WH; Chen EC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mammographic mass detection using wavelets as input to neural networks.
    Kilic N; Gorgel P; Ucan ON; Sertbas A
    J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):1083-8. PubMed ID: 20703600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Early signs of cancer present in the fine detail of mammograms.
    Raat EM; Evans KK
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282872. PubMed ID: 37018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of wavelet and curvelet for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram.
    Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Apr; 40(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 20163793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.