These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20703791)

  • 1. Using non-normal SEM to resolve the ACDE model in the classical twin design.
    Ozaki K; Toyoda H; Iwama N; Kubo S; Ando J
    Behav Genet; 2011 Mar; 41(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 20703791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the extent of parameter bias in the classical twin design: a comparison of parameter estimates from extended twin-family and classical twin designs.
    Coventry WL; Keller MC
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 8(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 15989749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.
    Wu H; Neale MC
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):441-63. PubMed ID: 25106394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direction of causation between shared and non-shared environmental factors.
    Ozaki K; Ando J
    Behav Genet; 2009 May; 39(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 19238533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design.
    Keller MC; Coventry WL
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 8(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 15989748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating heterogeneous parent-child environmental effects in biometrical genetic models.
    Guo X; Liu D; Wen C; He M; Wang X
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3501-8. PubMed ID: 23564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Univariate analysis of dichotomous or ordinal data from twin pairs: a simulation study comparing structural equation modeling and logistic regression.
    Ramakrishnan V; Meyer JM; Goldberg J; Henderson WG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8647380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of censoring on parameter estimates and power in genetic modeling.
    Derks EM; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res; 2004 Dec; 7(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15607017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting specific genotype by environment interactions using marginal maximum likelihood estimation in the classical twin design.
    Molenaar D; van der Sluis S; Boomsma DI; Dolan CV
    Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 22146987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.
    Keller MC; Medland SE; Duncan LE
    Behav Genet; 2010 May; 40(3):377-93. PubMed ID: 20013306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Look at Genetic and Environmental Architecture on Lipids Using Non-Normal Structural Equation Modeling in Male Twins: The NHLBI Twin Study.
    Wu SH; Ozaki K; Reed T; Krasnow RE; Dai J
    Behav Genet; 2017 Jul; 47(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 28413857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs.
    Posthuma D; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2000 Mar; 30(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 10979605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.
    Verhulst B; Prom-Wormley E; Keller M; Medland S; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2019 Jan; 49(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 30569348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions and its implications for targeting environmental interventions by genotype.
    Wallace HM
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():35. PubMed ID: 17029623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores in the ACE Twin Model to Estimate A-C Covariance.
    Dolan CV; Huijskens RCA; Minică CC; Neale MC; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):237-249. PubMed ID: 33523349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Statistical methods for the analysis of twin data].
    Fagnani C; Brescianini S; Medda E; Stazi MA
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 16801730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of the classical twin design revisited.
    Visscher PM
    Twin Res; 2004 Oct; 7(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15527666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models.
    Rijsdijk FV; Sham PC
    Brief Bioinform; 2002 Jun; 3(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 12139432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test of the equal environment assumption (EEA) in multivariate twin studies.
    Derks EM; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 16790150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nicholas (Nick) G. Martin and the Extended Twin Model.
    Maes HH
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2020 Apr; 23(2):84-86. PubMed ID: 32423500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.