128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20707459)
1. The measurement of ultrasound scattering from individual micron-sized objects and its application in single cell scattering.
Falou O; Rui M; El Kaffas A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):894-902. PubMed ID: 20707459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-frequency ultrasound scattering from microspheres and single cells.
Baddour RE; Sherar MD; Hunt JW; Czarnota GJ; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):934-43. PubMed ID: 15759712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface modes and acoustic scattering of microspheres and ultrasound contrast agents.
Falou O; Jafari Sojahrood A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1820-9. PubMed ID: 22978909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficients for weakly scattering, agar spheres in agar phantoms.
King MR; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Ma D; Haak A; Wirtzfeld LA; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):903-8. PubMed ID: 20707460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model for the ultrasound reflection from micro-beads and cells distributed in layers on a uniform surface.
Couture O; Cherin E; Foster FS
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4189-204. PubMed ID: 17664602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Particle Size and Number Density Online Analysis for Particle Suspension with Polarization-Differentiation Elastic Light Scattering Spectroscopy].
Chen WK; Fang H
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2016 Mar; 36(3):770-4. PubMed ID: 27400522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mode-converted diffuse ultrasonic backscatter.
Hu P; Kube CM; Koester LW; Turner JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):982-90. PubMed ID: 23927097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated Raman- and angular-scattering microscopy.
Smith ZJ; Berger AJ
Opt Lett; 2008 Apr; 33(7):714-6. PubMed ID: 18382527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Numerical analysis for transverse microbead trapping using 30 MHz focused ultrasound in ray acoustics regime.
Lee J
Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 23809757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of the trapping efficiency of an elliptical optical trap with rigid and elastic objects.
Kauppila A; Kinnunen M; Karmenyan A; Myllylä R
Appl Opt; 2012 Aug; 51(23):5705-12. PubMed ID: 22885584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fluid and elastic nature of nucleated cells: implications from the cellular backscatter response.
Baddour RE; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):EL16-22. PubMed ID: 17297821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding the limitations of ultrasonic backscatter measurements from microbubble populations.
Sboros V; Ramnarine KV; Moran CM; Pye SD; McDicken WN
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(23):4287-99. PubMed ID: 12502050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of elastic light scattering from two optically trapped microspheres and red blood cells in a transparent medium.
Kinnunen M; Kauppila A; Karmenyan A; Myllylä R
Opt Lett; 2011 Sep; 36(18):3554-6. PubMed ID: 21931388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of high frequency ultrasound scattering from non-nucleated biological specimens.
Falou O; Baddour RE; Nathanael G; Czarnota GJ; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):EL278-83. PubMed ID: 19045678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz.
Wear KA; Stiles TA; Frank GR; Madsen EL; Cheng F; Feleppa EJ; Hall CS; Kim BS; Lee P; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML; Raju BI; Shung KK; Wilson TA; Yuan JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1235-50. PubMed ID: 16123184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Backscatter coefficient imaging using a clinical scanner.
Boote EJ; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1145-52. PubMed ID: 1435591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High resolution ultrasound elastomicroscopy imaging of soft tissues: system development and feasibility.
Zheng YP; Bridal SL; Shi J; Saied A; Lu MH; Jaffre B; Mak AF; Laugier P
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3925-38. PubMed ID: 15470914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
