98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20707666)
1. Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of lymph node metastases to the ipsilateral axilla - initial experience in 194 patients using magnetic resonance mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 20707666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of breast MRI for prediction of lymph node metastases - systematic approach using 17 individual descriptors and a dedicated decision tree.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):885-94. PubMed ID: 20735278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial neural network for prediction of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: a phase II diagnostic study.
Bollschweiler EH; Mönig SP; Hensler K; Baldus SE; Maruyama K; Hölscher AH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 May; 11(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 15123460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Zoubi R; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W641-7. PubMed ID: 21512057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reasoning with uncertainty in pathology: artificial neural networks and logistic regression as tools for prediction of lymph node status in breast cancer patients.
Marchevsky AM; Shah S; Patel S
Mod Pathol; 1999 May; 12(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 10349989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential diagnosis of breast lesions 5 mm or less: is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging?
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 20498554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings.
Abdolmaleki P; Buadu LD; Murayama S; Murakami J; Hashiguchi N; Yabuuchi H; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 9445150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of nodal metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer: a neural model.
Naguib RN; Adams AE; Horne CH; Angus B; Smith AF; Sherbet GV; Lennard TW
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4A):2735-41. PubMed ID: 9252707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of lymph node metastasis with use of artificial neural networks based on gene expression profiles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kan T; Shimada Y; Sato F; Ito T; Kondo K; Watanabe G; Maeda M; Yamasaki S; Meltzer SJ; Imamura M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1070-8. PubMed ID: 15545505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR-determined metabolic phenotype of breast cancer in prediction of lymphatic spread, grade, and hormone status.
Bathen TF; Jensen LR; Sitter B; Fjösne HE; Halgunset J; Axelson DE; Gribbestad IS; Lundgren S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Aug; 104(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 17061040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer.
Mortellaro VE; Marshall J; Singer L; Hochwald SN; Chang M; Copeland EM; Grobmyer SR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 19466713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.
Gipponi M; Bassetti C; Canavese G; Catturich A; Di Somma C; Vecchio C; Nicolò G; Schenone F; Tomei D; Cafiero F
J Surg Oncol; 2004 Mar; 85(3):102-11. PubMed ID: 14991881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicopathological factors and nomograms predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Gimbergues P; Abrial C; Durando X; Le Bouedec G; Cachin F; Penault-Llorca F; Mouret-Reynier MA; Kwiatkowski F; Maublant J; Tchirkov A; Dauplat J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1946-51. PubMed ID: 19408057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
Mastsushima S; Nishiofuku H; Iwata H; Era S; Inaba Y; Kinosada Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 18504747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram.
Specht MC; Kattan MW; Gonen M; Fey J; Van Zee KJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):654-9. PubMed ID: 16021535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-axillary lymph node sampling for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastases.
Motomura K; Egawa C; Komoike Y; Nagumo S; Koyama H; Inaji H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):985-9. PubMed ID: 16788761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy?
Specht MC; Fey JV; Borgen PI; Cody HS
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jan; 200(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 15631914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
