205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20708405)
1. The European advocacy perspective on mammography screening.
Knox S
Breast; 2011 Feb; 20(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 20708405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The European patient advocacy perspective on specialist breast units and accreditation.
Knox S
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 25701514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast cancer screening: current status].
Mellado Rodríguez M; Osa Labrador AM
Radiologia; 2013; 55(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 22935684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan.
Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography: the goal is changing.
Harris R; Kinsinger L
Am Fam Physician; 2013 Feb; 87(4):246-7. PubMed ID: 23418796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening mammography and the "r" word.
Truog RD
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2501-3. PubMed ID: 19940292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography--early detection or over-diagnosis? Contribution from Australian data.
Bell RJ
Climacteric; 2014 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():66-72. PubMed ID: 25224048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening: why, when, and how many?
Gemignani ML
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21278511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
von Fournier D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions. European Breast Cancer Working Group.
O'Higgins N; Linos DA; Blichert-Toft M; Cataliotti L; de Wolf C; Rochard F; Rutgers EJ; Roberts PJ; Mattheiem W; da Silva MA; Holmberg L; Schulz KD; Smola MG; Mansel RE
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1998; 87(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 9598249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controversies regarding mammography, breast self-examination, and clinical breast examination.
Nelson AL
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 40(3):413-27. PubMed ID: 24021250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On mammography--more agreement than disagreement.
Partridge AH; Winer EP
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2499-501. PubMed ID: 19940286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening: conflicting guidelines and medicolegal risk.
Kachalia A; Mello MM
JAMA; 2013 Jun; 309(24):2555-6. PubMed ID: 23722969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and implementation of guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening: the European experience.
von Karsa L; Arrossi S
Salud Publica Mex; 2013; 55(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 23912545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current controversies in breast cancer screening.
Shepardson LB; Dean L
Semin Oncol; 2020 Aug; 47(4):177-181. PubMed ID: 32513421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Consensus conference: should breast cancer screening be tailored to selected risk factors?].
Bonelli L; Poirè I
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):328-35. PubMed ID: 24293499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How the USPSTF's Mammographic Screening Guidelines Should Be Interpreted.
Prasad V
Am J Med; 2017 Jul; 130(7):769-770. PubMed ID: 28344145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Recommended age groups and frequency of mammography screening: a systematic review].
Pereira MB; Oliveira J; Ribeiro DP; Castro B; Yaphe J; de Sousa JC
Cien Saude Colet; 2014 Apr; 19(4):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24820596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
