These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20708836)

  • 1. Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?
    Niles DE; Nishisaki A; Sutton RM; Brunner S; Stavland M; Mahadevaiah S; Meaney PA; Maltese MR; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1540-3. PubMed ID: 20708836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Chen B; Yin C; Ristagno G; Quan W; Tan Q; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 23000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.
    White RD; Blackwell TH; Russell JK; Snyder DE; Jorgenson DB
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jan; 64(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15629557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A focused investigation of expedited, stack of three shocks versus chest compressions first followed by single shocks for monitored ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia cardiopulmonary arrest in an in-hospital setting.
    Davis D; Aguilar SA; Sell R; Minokadeh A; Husa R
    J Hosp Med; 2016 Apr; 11(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 26510012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework of current based defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of biphasic truncated exponential waveform in rabbits.
    Li W; Li J; Wei L; Wang J; Peng L; Wang J; Yin C; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1586. PubMed ID: 33452293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing pre-shock chest compression pauses in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle by performing an earlier rhythm analysis.
    Steinberg MT; Olsen JA; Brunborg C; Persse D; Sterz F; Lozano M; Brouwer MA; Westfall M; Souders CM; van Grunsven PM; Travis DT; Lerner EB; Wik L
    Resuscitation; 2015 Feb; 87():33-7. PubMed ID: 25461493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated external defibrillator electrode size and termination of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Yin RT; Taylor TG; de Graaf C; Ekkel MM; Chapman FW; Koster RW
    Resuscitation; 2023 Apr; 185():109754. PubMed ID: 36842678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients.
    Gliner BE; White RD
    Resuscitation; 1999 Jul; 41(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 10488935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Faddy SC; Jennings PA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2(2):CD006762. PubMed ID: 26904970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transthoracic defibrillation: does electrode adhesive pad position alter transthoracic impedance?
    Garcia LA; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 1998 Jun; 37(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 9715772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ventricular defibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):741-4. PubMed ID: 2801525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transthoracic impedance does not decrease with rapidly repeated countershocks in a swine cardiac arrest model.
    Niemann JT; Garner D; Lewis RJ
    Resuscitation; 2003 Jan; 56(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 12505744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between transthoracic impedance and electrical cardioversion success with biphasic defibrillators: An analysis of 1055 shocks for atrial fibrillation and flutter.
    Sadek MM; Chaugai V; Cleland MJ; Zakutney TJ; Birnie DH; Ramirez FD
    Clin Cardiol; 2018 May; 41(5):666-670. PubMed ID: 29532491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Transthoracic Investigators.
    Bardy GH; Marchlinski FE; Sharma AD; Worley SJ; Luceri RM; Yee R; Halperin BD; Fellows CL; Ahern TS; Chilson DA; Packer DL; Wilber DJ; Mattioni TA; Reddy R; Kronmal RA; Lazzara R
    Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(10):2507-14. PubMed ID: 8921795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.