These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Reliability-based voxel selection. Tarhan L; Konkle T Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 207():116350. PubMed ID: 31733373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of spatial fMRI resolution on the classification of naturalistic movies. Mandelkow H; de Zwart JA; Duyn JH Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():45-55. PubMed ID: 28842385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A nonparametric bayesian approach to detecting spatial activation patterns in fMRI data. Kim S; Smyth P; Stern H Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):217-24. PubMed ID: 17354775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sparse logistic regression for whole-brain classification of fMRI data. Ryali S; Supekar K; Abrams DA; Menon V Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 20188193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for pattern-information fMRI. Misaki M; Kim Y; Bandettini PA; Kriegeskorte N Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 20580933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatially aggregated multiclass pattern classification in functional MRI using optimally selected functional brain areas. Zheng W; Ackley ES; Martínez-Ramón M; Posse S Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 31(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 22902471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discovering brain regions relevant to obsessive-compulsive disorder identification through bagging and transduction. Parrado-Hernández E; Gómez-Verdejo V; Martínez-Ramón M; Shawe-Taylor J; Alonso P; Pujol J; Menchón JM; Cardoner N; Soriano-Mas C Med Image Anal; 2014 Apr; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 24556078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsupervised learning and mapping of active brain functional MRI signals based on hidden semi-Markov event sequence models. Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Feb; 24(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 15707252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-subject brain decoding with multi-task feature selection. Wang L; Tang X; Liu W; Peng Y; Gao T; Xu Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2987-94. PubMed ID: 25227006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sparse regularization techniques provide novel insights into outcome integration processes. Mohr H; Wolfensteller U; Frimmel S; Ruge H Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():163-76. PubMed ID: 25467302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sparse estimation automatically selects voxels relevant for the decoding of fMRI activity patterns. Yamashita O; Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Tong F; Kamitani Y Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1414-29. PubMed ID: 18598768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A SVM-based quantitative fMRI method for resting-state functional network detection. Song X; Chen NK Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):819-31. PubMed ID: 24928301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated classification of fMRI data employing trial-based imagery tasks. Lee JH; Marzelli M; Jolesz FA; Yoo SS Med Image Anal; 2009 Jun; 13(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 19233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet. Grosenick L; Klingenberg B; Katovich K; Knutson B; Taylor JE Neuroimage; 2013 May; 72():304-21. PubMed ID: 23298747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The advantage of brief fMRI acquisition runs for multi-voxel pattern detection across runs. Coutanche MN; Thompson-Schill SL Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1113-9. PubMed ID: 22498658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]