BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20709270)

  • 1. Reliability of a two-dimensional footprint measurement approach.
    Reel S; Rouse S; Vernon W; Doherty P
    Sci Justice; 2010 Sep; 50(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 20709270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review.
    Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of scapular positioning measurement procedure using the palpation meter (PALM).
    da Costa BR; Armijo-Olivo S; Gadotti I; Warren S; Reid DC; Magee DJ
    Physiotherapy; 2010 Mar; 96(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 20113764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
    van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intra-tester reliability of clinical measurement to determine medio-lateral patellar position using a pachymeter or visual assessment.
    Sacco IC; Onodera AN; Butugan MK; Taddei UT; Mendes YC; Galhardo B; Padua M; Dreyer SH; Lobo RA; Aliberti S
    Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 19574052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Vicenzino B; Teyhen DS; Molloy JM; Christie DS; Collins N
    Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20307441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
    Howsam N; Bridgen A
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of stature from static and dynamic footprints.
    Reel S; Rouse S; Vernon W; Doherty P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):283.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22154435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of foot caliper.
    Janchai S; Tantisiriwat N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S85-9. PubMed ID: 16623009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing correlation of footprints with body weight--forensic aspects.
    Krishan K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 18515026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and Validity of the Footprint Assessment Method Using Photoshop CS5 Software.
    Gutiérrez-Vilahú L; Massó-Ortigosa N; Costa-Tutusaus L; Guerra-Balic M
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2015 May; 105(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 26146968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
    Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system.
    Queen RM; Mall NA; Hardaker WM; Nunley JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability measurements of lateral scapular slide test at three different degrees of shoulder joint abduction.
    Shadmehr A; Bagheri H; Ansari NN; Sarafraz H
    Br J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 44(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 18812417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-dimensional linear analysis of dynamic bare footprints: A comparison of measurement techniques.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31472800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.