85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20709479)
1. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound.
Ko ES; Lee BH; Choi HY; Kim RB; Noh WC
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20709479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should breast MRI be performed with adjustment for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle? Correlation between mammographic density, age, and background enhancement on breast MRI without adjusting for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Watanabe J
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1539-42. PubMed ID: 21592704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI.
Koo HR; Moon WK; Chun IK; Eo JS; Jeyanth JX; Chang JM; Cho N; Kang KW
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1738-42. PubMed ID: 23806533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography.
Cubuk R; Tasali N; Narin B; Keskiner F; Celik L; Guney S
Radiol Med; 2010 Apr; 115(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 20082222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: inter-observer agreement study.
Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28273746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?
Hansen NL; Kuhl CK; Barabasch A; Strobel K; Schrading S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 24446230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of background parenchymal echogenicity on breast ultrasound: Correlation with mammographic breast density and background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging.
Ko KH; Jung HK; Kim I
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(33):e7850. PubMed ID: 28816987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using mammography, ultrasonography, and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Kawamura A; Satake H; Ishigaki S; Ikeda M; Kimura R; Shimamoto K; Naganawa S
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2015 Aug; 77(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 26412889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women.
Giess CS; Raza S; Birdwell RL
Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1343-60. PubMed ID: 24025928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density.
Scaranelo AM; Carrillo MC; Fleming R; Jacks LM; Kulkarni SR; Crystal P
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 23418005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
Obenauer S; Dammert S
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of background echotexture on automated breast ultrasound using BI-RADS and modified classification: Association with clinical features and mammographic density.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Byon JH; Youk JH
J Clin Ultrasound; 2023 May; 51(4):687-695. PubMed ID: 37014174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.
Sogani J; Morris EA; Kaplan JB; D'Alessio D; Goldman D; Moskowitz CS; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 27379544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
Molleran V; Mahoney MC
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):171-85, vii. PubMed ID: 20494304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
