These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2070957)

  • 1. An evaluation of antenatal fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Schwartz DB; Sherman SJ; Goyert GL; Fields P; Simkins S; Daoud Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Jul; 40(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 2070957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Saraçoğlu F; Göl K; Sahin I; Türkkani B; Oztopçu C
    J Perinatol; 1999 Mar; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 10642968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Goonewardene M; Hanwellage K
    Ceylon Med J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21542428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal surveillance in diabetic pregnancy. II. The nonstress test versus the oxytocin challenge test.
    Olofsson P; Sjöberg NO; Solum T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 3739648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simplified biophysical profile: an antepartum fetal screening test.
    Kamel HS; Makhlouf AM; Youssef AA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1999; 47(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 10352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing.
    Esin S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vibro-acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Jakobsson J; Westgren M
    J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 1432550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of a modified biophysical profile for fetal acidemia in high-risk pregnancies.
    Compitak K; Pheungtavechok O
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S12-7. PubMed ID: 21213489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal well-being: nonimaging assessment and the biophysical profile.
    Jackson GM; Forouzan I; Cohen AW
    Semin Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 26(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 2006429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of fetal heart rate decelerations following acoustic stimulation with perinatal outcome.
    Dunston-Boone G; Kuhlman K; Kaufmann M
    Am J Perinatol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 8540939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The use of acoustic stimuli for assessing fetal status ante- and intranatally].
    Samodurov PS
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Nov; (11):33-6. PubMed ID: 1814224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hasanpour S; Raouf S; Shamsalizadeh N; Bani S; Ghojazadeh M; Sheikhan F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.