49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20709724)
1. Mandibular mechanics following osteotomy and appliance placement II: Bone strain on the body and condylar neck.
Rafferty KL; Sun Z; Egbert MA; Baird EE; Herring SW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 16546641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of latency on bone lengthening force and bone mineralization: an investigation using strain gauge mounted on internal distractor device.
Singare S; Li D; Liu Y; Wu Z; Wang J
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():18. PubMed ID: 16524487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Mandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis (MSDO) on the Sagittal Dimension and Long-Term Skeletal stability.
Sentucq C; Crétal J; Ferri J
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 37643079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone Volume Analysis and Associated Influencing Factors in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Retrospective Analysis.
Tan P; Telha W; Bi R; Jiang N; Zhu S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 82(6):655-662. PubMed ID: 38537668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the skeletal and dental changes of tooth-borne vs. bone-borne expansion devices in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A finite element study.
Tehranchi A; Ameli N; Najirad Z; Mirhashemi FS
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 Nov; 10(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 24379867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biology of distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular and craniomaxillofacial defects: A review.
Natu SS; Ali I; Alam S; Giri KY; Agarwal A; Kulkarni VA
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jan; 11(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 24688555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why do humans have chins? Testing the mechanical significance of modern human symphyseal morphology with finite element analysis.
Gröning F; Liu J; Fagan MJ; O'Higgins P
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Apr; 144(4):593-606. PubMed ID: 21404235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical characterization of soft-tissue stiffness during mandibular distraction.
Bildstein AC; Dubois G; Preud'homme R; Rouch P; Veyssière A; Bénateau H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38796333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel mandibular distraction osteogenesis protocol: an
Şensoy AT; Kaymaz I; Ertaş Ü
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Nov; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 33241695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of different distraction rates in separate retractions of canine: Randomized control trial.
Parihar AV; Verma S; Subash P; Singh AK
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(3):390-397. PubMed ID: 36683919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel patient-specific helical maxillary distractor: an in vitro feasibility study.
Gateno J; Bartlett S; Kim D; Xia J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38570291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a Simple Appliance to Prevent Mucosal Irritation by the Distractor Rod during Vertical Distraction: Case Report.
Muglali M; Celebi N; Inal S; Bekcioglu B; Bas B
Eur J Dent; 2008 Jul; 2(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 19212548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National Biomechanics Day accelerates the expansion of the biomechanics universe.
DeVita P
J Biomech; 2023 Dec; 161():111570. PubMed ID: 37028953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review.
Starch-Jensen T; Kjellerup AD; Blæhr TL
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2018; 9(3):e1. PubMed ID: 30429961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal and dental effects of tooth-borne versus hybrid devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Niculescu JA; King JW; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 23786596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Boccaccio A; Ballini A; Pappalettere C; Tullo D; Cantore S; Desiate A
Int J Biol Sci; 2011 Jan; 7(1):112-32. PubMed ID: 21278921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices.
Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Carano A; Cozzani M
J Biomech; 2006; 39(15):2907-18. PubMed ID: 16321393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
