174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2070977)
1. A randomized comparison of multipolar electrocoagulation and injection sclerosis for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer.
Waring JP; Sanowski RA; Sawyer RL; Woods CA; Foutch PG
Gastrointest Endosc; 1991; 37(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 2070977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective, randomized trial.
Laine L
Gastroenterology; 1990 Nov; 99(5):1303-6. PubMed ID: 2210238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic injection therapy vs. multipolar electrocoagulation vs. laser vs. injection + octreotide vs. injection + omeprazole in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective randomized study.
Sofia C; Portela F; Gregório C; Rosa A; Camacho E; Tomé L; Ferreira M; Andrade P; Cabral P; Romãozinho J; Gouveia H; Leitão M; Pimenta I; Donato A; Freitas D
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(35):1332-6. PubMed ID: 11100345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of endoscopic microwave coagulation and endoscopic sclerosis in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
Panés J; Viver J; Forné M
Gastrointest Endosc; 1991; 37(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 1756919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled trial comparing epinephrine injection plus heat probe coagulation versus epinephrine injection plus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcers.
Chau CH; Siu WT; Law BK; Tang CN; Kwok SY; Luk YW; Lao WC; Li MK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Apr; 57(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 12665753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An economic analysis of patients with active arterial peptic ulcer hemorrhage treated with endoscopic heater probe, injection sclerosis, or surgery in a prospective, randomized trial.
Gralnek IM; Jensen DM; Kovacs TO; Jutabha R; Jensen ME; Cheng S; Gornbein J; Freeman ML; Machicado GA; Smith J; Sue M; Kominski G
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Aug; 46(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9283858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monopolar coagulation versus conventional endoscopic treatment for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized study.
Soon MS; Wu SS; Chen YY; Fan CS; Lin OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Sep; 58(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 14528202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparative study of laser photocoagulation, heater probe, and bipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of actively bleeding ulcers.
Hui WM; Ng MM; Lok AS; Lai CL; Lau YN; Lam SK
Gastrointest Endosc; 1991; 37(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2070978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study of the effectiveness of thermocoagulation, sclerotherapy and a combination of sclerotherapy and thermocoagulation in the treatment of acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage].
Bago J; Babić D; Babić Z; Simović I; Solarić M
Lijec Vjesn; 1993; 115(1-2):48-52. PubMed ID: 8377577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How efficient is endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.
Skok P
Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(15):861-5. PubMed ID: 9222705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of adrenaline injection and bipolar electrocoagulation for the arrest of peptic ulcer bleeding.
Lin HJ; Tseng GY; Perng CL; Lee FY; Chang FY; Lee SD
Gut; 1999 May; 44(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 10205211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic injection sclerosis: effective treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer.
Rajgopal C; Palmer KR
Gut; 1991 Jul; 32(7):727-9. PubMed ID: 1855676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of endoscopic injection sclerosis with ethanolamine oleate and ethanol for bleeding peptic ulcer.
Mäkelä JT; Kiviniemi H; Laitinen ST
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1996 Nov; 31(11):1059-62. PubMed ID: 8938897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective, randomized comparison of 10-Fr versus 7-Fr bipolar electrocoagulation catheter in combination with adrenaline injection in the endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
Paspatis GA; Charoniti I; Papanikolaou N; Vardas E; Chlouverakis G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2192-7. PubMed ID: 14572567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of endoscopic injection therapy versus the heater probe in major peptic ulcer haemorrhage.
Choudari CP; Rajgopal C; Palmer KR
Gut; 1992 Sep; 33(9):1159-61. PubMed ID: 1427365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Sclerotherapy with 75% ethanol in the control of hemorrhage caused by peptic ulcer disease].
Cifuentes C; Mavares J; Ramírez F; Voso J; Monasterios W; Hinestrosa H; Quiros E
G E N; 1994; 48(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7926612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined epinephrine and bipolar probe coagulation vs. bipolar probe coagulation alone for bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized, controlled trial.
Bianco MA; Rotondano G; Marmo R; Piscopo R; Orsini L; Cipolletta L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Dec; 60(6):910-5. PubMed ID: 15605005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bleeding peptic ulcer: natural history and place of endoscopic hemostasis].
Lesur G; Artru P; Mitry E
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000; 24(6-7):656-66. PubMed ID: 10962390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of peptic ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels. A prospective, controlled trial.
Laine L
Ann Intern Med; 1989 Apr; 110(7):510-4. PubMed ID: 2647014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic hemostasis. An effective therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.
Sacks HS; Chalmers TC; Blum AL; Berrier J; Pagano D
JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 2142225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
