These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20712442)

  • 1. A comparison of peripheral marginal bone loss at dental implants measured with conventional intraoral film and digitized radiographs.
    Kamburoğlu K; Gülşahı A; Genç Y; Paksoy CS
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 20712442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of crestal bone loss and implant stability among the implants placed with conventional procedure and using osteotome technique: a clinical study.
    Padmanabhan TV; Gupta RK
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 21142790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.
    Berberi AN; Tehini GE; Noujeim ZF; Khairallah AA; Abousehlib MN; Salameh ZA
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):521-7. PubMed ID: 24750449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of crestal bone loss and implant stability between osteotome and conventional implant insertion techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial study.
    Shayesteh YS; Khojasteh A; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Bassir SH; Hossaini M; Alikhasi M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 21815994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.
    Linkevicius T; Apse P; Grybauskas S; Puisys A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 19885413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: radiographic evaluation at 24 months.
    Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E
    J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1616-21. PubMed ID: 19792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.
    Peñarrocha M; Viña JA; Carrillo C; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):e322-30. PubMed ID: 22538025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
    Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
    J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla.
    Gotfredsen K
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 19673954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate, early, and late implant placement in first-molar sites: a retrospective case series.
    Annibali S; Bignozzi I; Iacovazzi L; La Monaca G; Cristalli MP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1108-22. PubMed ID: 22010096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients.
    Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Oates TW
    J Periodontol; 2009 May; 80(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 19405825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study.
    Crespi R; Capparé P; Gherlone E; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):753-8. PubMed ID: 18807574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study.
    Fischer K; Bäckström M; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 18384399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations.
    Block MS; Mercante DE; Lirette D; Mohamed W; Ryser M; Castellon P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11 Suppl):89-107. PubMed ID: 19835754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite™ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery.
    De Bruyn H; Atashkadeh M; Cosyn J; van de Velde T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 19744199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do angulated implants increase the amount of bone loss around implants in the anterior maxilla?
    Tabrizi R; Pourdanesh F; Zare S; Daneste H; Zeini N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 23351760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of static magnetic fields on the osseointegration of immediately placed implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Siadat H; Bassir SH; Alikhasi M; Shayesteh YS; Khojasteh A; Monzavi A
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 23114829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.