These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20712976)

  • 1. [Aesthetic repercussions of the class II treatment on the profile: comparative study Distal Activ Concept (DAC)/Extra-Oral Force (EOF)].
    Dénarié S; Gebeile-Chauty S; Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2010 Sep; 81(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 20712976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
    Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term mandibular skeletal and dental effects of standard edgewise treatment.
    Bayirli B; Vaden JL; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 24182584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Kiki A; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 20053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of a complex malocclusion in a growing skeletal Class II patient.
    El Refaei AK; Fayed MM; Heider AM; Mostafa YA
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Mar; 48(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 24762377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.