These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20713180)
1. Assessing the success probability of a Phase III clinical trial based on Phase II data. Su Z Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):620-3. PubMed ID: 20713180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the outcome of phase III trials using phase II data: a case study of clinical trial simulation in late stage drug development. De Ridder F Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology. Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Drug Development Model: a case study in Bayesian clinical trial simulation. Nixon RM; O'Hagan A; Oakley J; Madan J; Stevens JW; Bansback N; Brennan A Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):371-89. PubMed ID: 19340851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of predictive probabilities in phase II and phase III clinical trials. Johns D; Andersen JS J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 10091910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint. Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical guidelines for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that use Bayesian methods. Kimani PK; Glimm E; Maurer W; Hutton JL; Stallard N Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2068-85. PubMed ID: 22437262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian models for subgroup analysis in clinical trials. Jones HE; Ohlssen DI; Neuenschwander B; Racine A; Branson M Clin Trials; 2011 Apr; 8(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 21282293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adapting by calibration the sample size of a phase III trial on the basis of phase II data. Martini DD Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20140977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach to evaluate clinical trial designs for tests of superiority and non-inferiority. Shao Y; Mukhi V; Goldberg JD Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):504-19. PubMed ID: 17854052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A seamless phase II/III design with sample-size re-estimation. Bischoff W; Miller F J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 20183428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A model to select regimens for phase III trials for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Freidlin B; Breathnach OS; Johnson BE Clin Cancer Res; 2003 Mar; 9(3):917-22. PubMed ID: 12631588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring. Johnson VE; Cook JD Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive checking for Bayesian interim analyses in clinical trials. Daimon T Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):740-50. PubMed ID: 18571477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology. Brannath W; Zuber E; Branson M; Bretz F; Gallo P; Posch M; Racine-Poon A Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1445-63. PubMed ID: 19266565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixtures of prior distributions for predictive Bayesian sample size calculations in clinical trials. Brutti P; De Santis F; Gubbiotti S Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2185-201. PubMed ID: 19462415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]