BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20714086)

  • 1. Improving visibility of X-ray phase-contrast imaging with Wiener filtering.
    Gong S; Gao F; Zhou Z
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2010; 18(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 20714086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental validation of a simple model capable of predicting the phase contrast imaging capabilities of any x-ray imaging system.
    Olivo A; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3015-30. PubMed ID: 16757859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconvolution of x-ray phase contrast images as a way to retrieve phase information lost due to insufficient resolution.
    Olivo A; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N347-54. PubMed ID: 19590117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.
    Tang X; Hsieh J; Nilsen RA; Dutta S; Samsonov D; Hagiwara A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):855-74. PubMed ID: 16467583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
    Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconvolution of vibroacoustic images using a simulation model based on a three dimensional point spread function.
    Perciano T; Urban MW; Mascarenhas ND; Fatemi M; Frery AC; Silva GT
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Jan; 53(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 22617182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography.
    Schaller S; Wildberger JE; Raupach R; Niethammer M; Klingenbeck-Regn K; Flohr T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):846-53. PubMed ID: 12906238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for improving image quality of free space propagation x-ray phase contrast imaging.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7459-79. PubMed ID: 23093444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of effects of phase aberration and noise on high-frame-rate imaging.
    Chen H; Lu JY
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Jan; 53(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 22546551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing planar image quality of rotating slat and parallel hole collimation: influence of system modeling.
    Van Holen R; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 18356576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-dimensional weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT under a circular source trajectory.
    Tang X; Hsieh J; Hagiwara A; Nilsen RA; Thibault JB; Drapkin E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3889-905. PubMed ID: 16077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of signal diffusion on x-ray phase contrast images.
    Ignatyev K; Munro PR; Speller RD; Olivo A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Jul; 82(7):073702. PubMed ID: 21806184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images.
    Hara T; Ichikawa K; Sanada S; Ida Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 19410407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.