BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20714984)

  • 1. [Perioperative morbidity in lumbar disc replacement].
    Däxle M; Käfer W; Kocak T; Reichel H; Cakir B
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20714984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement.
    Mayer HM; Wiechert K
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S159-65. PubMed ID: 12234444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique.
    de Maat GH; Punt IM; van Rhijn LW; Schurink GW; van Ooij A
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 19525788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium?
    Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 20399356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc.
    Regan JJ; McAfee PC; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Geisler FH; Garcia R; Maxwell JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up.
    Park CK; Ryu KS; Jee WH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1755-61. PubMed ID: 18580548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Local vertebral body destruction after migration of a nucleus replacement].
    Schnake KJ; Weigert F; Kandziora F; Haas NP
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(5):649-51. PubMed ID: 17939078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
    Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
    Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short segment coronal plane deformity after two-level lumbar total disc replacement.
    Ching AC; Birkenmaier C; Hart RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 20042955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intervertebral prosthesis versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: one-year results of a prospective non-randomised study.
    Schroven I; Dorofey D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 16570900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Outcome after cervical anterior fusion--a clinical study of 368 patients].
    Lemcke J; Menz H; Al-Zain F; Meier U
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(6):744-52. PubMed ID: 18072041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of disc prosthesis position on segmental motion in the lumbar spine].
    Weisskopf M; Maus U; Ohnsorge JA; Prescher A; Pandorf T; Birnbaum K
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 20135599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative outcomes of anterior lumbar surgery in obese versus non-obese patients.
    Peng CW; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Nalbandian MM
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 19525153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant design may influence delayed heterotopic ossification after total disk arthroplasty in lumbar spine.
    Kerr EJ; Jawahar A; Kay S; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley PD
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72(6):747-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 20082839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Perioperative morbidity of lumbar stabilisation with Dynesys].
    Kocak T; Cakir B; Däxle M; Reichel H; Käfer W; Mattes T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 19358077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.