These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20715385)

  • 1. Issues and expectations for EMG decomposition.
    McGill KC
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():221-9. PubMed ID: 20715385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor unit number estimation with high-density surface EMG: principles and implications.
    van Dijk JP; Stegeman DF; Zwarts MJ; Blok JH
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():105-18. PubMed ID: 20715372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decomposition-enhanced spike triggered averaging MUNE: validity, reliability, and impact of contraction force.
    Doherty TJ; Stashuk DW; Boe SG
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():119-27. PubMed ID: 20715373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The CMAP scan.
    Visser GH; Blok JH
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():65-77. PubMed ID: 20715368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of three quantitative motor unit analysis algorithms.
    McGill KC
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():273-8. PubMed ID: 20715389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor unit number estimates--from A to Z.
    Daube JR
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 Mar; 242(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 16423366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface EMG decomposition requires an appropriate validation.
    Farina D; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 105(2):981-2; author reply 983-4. PubMed ID: 21304161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface EMG and fatigue.
    Jurell KC
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 Nov; 9(4):933-47, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 9894104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulation study on the relation between the motor unit depth and action potential from multi-channel surface electromyography recordings.
    He J; Luo Z
    J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 54():146-151. PubMed ID: 29805080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor unit number estimation: new techniques and new uses.
    Bromberg MB
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 57():120-36. PubMed ID: 16106613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor unit number estimations (MUNEs): past, present and future.
    Brown WF
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():3-23. PubMed ID: 20715363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing and standardizing quantitative EMG.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():263-9. PubMed ID: 20715388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cremaster muscle motor unit action potentials.
    Ozdemirkiran T; Ertekin C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 122(8):1679-85. PubMed ID: 21324736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insight into the motor unit activation and structure properties gained from EMG signal analysis.
    Zalewska E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):449-50. PubMed ID: 19243991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EMG signal decomposition using motor unit potential train validity.
    Parsaei H; Stashuk DW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 23033332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of motor unit placement algorithms for EMG simulation.
    Hamilton-Wright A; Navallas J; Stashuk DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4874-7. PubMed ID: 21096651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study on the classification of motor unit action potentials from single-channel surface EMG signal based on the wavelet analysis].
    Li Q; Yang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 27(4):893-7. PubMed ID: 20842866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of Bayesian statistical analysis in normal and ALS subjects.
    Henderson RD; Ridall PG; Pettitt AN; McCombe PA
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():57-63. PubMed ID: 20715367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three algorithms for multi-motor unit detection and waveform marking.
    Brownell AA; Ni O; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Apr; 33(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 16382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.