These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20715388)

  • 21. Skill and selection bias has least influence on motor unit action potential firing rate/frequency.
    Chu J; Takehara I; Li TC; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 14626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rigorous performance assessment of the algorithms for resolving motor unit action potential superpositions.
    Shirzadi M; Marateb HR; McGill KC; Mañanas MA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2021 Feb; 56():102510. PubMed ID: 33341461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of motor unit placement algorithms for EMG simulation.
    Hamilton-Wright A; Navallas J; Stashuk DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4874-7. PubMed ID: 21096651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative motor unit action potentials (QMUAP) in whiplash patients with neck and upper-limb pain.
    Chu J; Eun SS; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005; 45(6):323-8. PubMed ID: 16315969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic decomposition of multichannel intramuscular EMG signals.
    Florestal JR; Mathieu PA; McGill KC
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17513128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MUAP extraction and classification based on wavelet transform and ICA for EMG decomposition.
    Ren X; Hu X; Wang Z; Yan Z
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 May; 44(5):371-82. PubMed ID: 16937179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adaptive motor unit action potential clustering using shape and temporal information.
    Stashuk D; Qu Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1996 Jan; 34(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 8857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital filter design for peak detection of surface EMG.
    Xu Z; Xiao S
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2000 Aug; 10(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 10969201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A genetic algorithm for the resolution of superimposed motor unit action potentials.
    Florestal JR; Mathieu PA; Plamondon R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 54(12):2163-71. PubMed ID: 18075032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of intramuscular needle position on motor unit action potential metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 17221877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sliding window averaging in normal and pathological motor unit action potential trains.
    Malanda-Trigueros A; Navallas J; Rodriguez-Falces J; Rodriguez-Carreño I; Porta S; Fernández-Martínez M; Gila L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jun; 129(6):1170-1181. PubMed ID: 29649769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Concentric needle EMG versus macro EMG I. Relation in healthy subjects.
    Finsterer J; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 111(7):1211-5. PubMed ID: 10880796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Functional-QEMG" a new reliable method in daily routine investigation.
    Kopec J; Emeryk-Szajewska B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 42(8):495-506. PubMed ID: 12489351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-motor unit action potential analysis (MMA).
    Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE; Charles A
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1155-66. PubMed ID: 7659110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals.
    Kleine BU; van Dijk JP; Lapatki BG; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Oct; 17(5):535-48. PubMed ID: 16904342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of high-pass filtering on MUAP metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Dec; 40(6):1008-11. PubMed ID: 19670322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals.
    Stashuk DW
    Med Eng Phys; 1999; 21(6-7):389-404. PubMed ID: 10624736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rise time or rise rate: which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?
    Masakado Y; Akaboshi K; Kimura A; Chino N
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 11039123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time-scale analysis of motor unit action potentials.
    Pattichis CS; Pattichis MS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1320-9. PubMed ID: 10582417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Issues and expectations for EMG decomposition.
    McGill KC
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():221-9. PubMed ID: 20715385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.