These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20715694)

  • 1. [Technologies for cardiac valve prostheses].
    Nakano K
    Kyobu Geka; 2009 Jul; 62(8 Suppl):692-8. PubMed ID: 20715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current status of cardiac valve prosthesis].
    Komatsu S
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 86(9):1011-4. PubMed ID: 4088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
    Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bio-artificial organs: cardiac applications].
    Flameng W
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15553097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are all bileaflet mechanical valves equal?
    Halkos ME; Puskas JD
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 24(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19532099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Historical evolution of prosthetic heart valves].
    Tamames Escobar S
    An R Acad Nac Med (Madr); 2006; 123(3):495-523; discussion 523-4. PubMed ID: 17451095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac valve replacement. Problems solved and unsolved.
    Borst HG; Papagiannakis N; Bedderman C; Oelert H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Apr; 27(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 451983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
    Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
    Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of stenting on the behavior of amino-oleic acid-treated, glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valves in a sheep model.
    Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Verbeken E; Van Lommel A; Nishida T; Perek B; Zietkiewicz M; Leunens V; Flameng W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):552-9; discussion 559-60. PubMed ID: 10947049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosthetic heart valves: catering for the few.
    Zilla P; Brink J; Human P; Bezuidenhout D
    Biomaterials; 2008 Feb; 29(4):385-406. PubMed ID: 17950840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.
    Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Edwards MB; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; Van Herwerden LA; Taylor KM; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
    Heart; 2004 Oct; 90(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 15367517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing a prosthetic heart valve.
    Wernly JA; Crawford MH
    Cardiol Clin; 1991 May; 9(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 2054821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
    Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
    Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.