335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20716804)
1. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.
Layfield LJ; Anderson GM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):466-70. PubMed ID: 20716804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center.
Francis DL; Prabhakar S; Sanderson SO
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):972-5. PubMed ID: 19259073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
Fabbretti G
Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
Zarbo RJ; Tuthill JM; D'Angelo R; Varney R; Mahar B; Neuman C; Ormsby A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 19289582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radio-Frequency Identification Specimen Tracking to Improve Quality in Anatomic Pathology.
Norgan AP; Simon KE; Feehan BA; Saari LL; Doppler JM; Welder GS; Sedarski JA; Yoch CT; Comfere NI; Martin JA; Bartholmai BJ; Reichard RR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 144(2):189-195. PubMed ID: 31246113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 8629896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].
Minato H; Fukushima M; Nojima T; Nakano M
Rinsho Byori; 2013 Aug; 61(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 24218776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy.
Morrison AP; Tanasijevic MJ; Goonan EM; Lobo MM; Bates MM; Lipsitz SR; Bates DW; Melanson SE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):870-7. PubMed ID: 20472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process.
Hill PM; Mareiniss D; Murphy P; Gardner H; Hsieh YH; Levy F; Kelen GD
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 20822830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical Specimen Management: A Descriptive Study of 648 Adverse Events and Near Misses.
Steelman VM; Williams TL; Szekendi MK; Halverson AL; Dintzis SM; Pavkovic S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Dec; 140(12):1390-1396. PubMed ID: 27610645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the accuracy of specimen labeling.
Dock B
Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 16315737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors.
Da Rin G
Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized patient identification and specimen labeling: a retrospective analysis on improving patient safety.
Kim JK; Dotson B; Thomas S; Nelson KC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 22841126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk management: correct patient and specimen identification in a surgical pathology laboratory. The experience of Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Fabbretti G
Pathologica; 2010 Jun; 102(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 21171512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]