170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20717078)
1. Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent-seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths.
Cunha JA; Pickett B; Pouliot J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 11(3):3096. PubMed ID: 20717078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An open-source genetic algorithm for determining optimal seed distributions for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
McGeachy P; Madamesila J; Beauchamp A; Khan R
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 26023047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):854-61. PubMed ID: 12788195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.
Beaulieu L; Archambault L; Aubin S; Oral E; Taschereau R; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 15001275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knowledge-based inverse treatment planning for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Guthier CV; Orio PF; Buzurovic I; Cormack RA
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2108-2117. PubMed ID: 33586191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11240263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class solution for inversely planned permanent prostate implants to mimic an experienced dosimetrist.
Lessard E; Kwa SL; Pickett B; Roach M; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2773-82. PubMed ID: 16964853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated treatment planning engine for prostate seed implant brachytherapy.
Yu Y; Zhang JB; Brasacchio RA; Okunieff PG; Rubens DJ; Strang JG; Soni A; Messing EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):647-52. PubMed ID: 10078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A GPU-based multi-criteria optimization algorithm for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Cui S; Ma Y; Després P; Adam M Cunha J; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105005. PubMed ID: 30970341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.
Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
