172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20717085)
1. Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN-IMRT.
Worthy D; Wu Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 May; 11(3):3187. PubMed ID: 20717085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost.
Su Z; Li Z; Henderson R; Hoppe B; Nichols RC; Bryant C; Mendenhall W; Mendenhall N
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):04NT04. PubMed ID: 30630135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of optimal PTV margin for patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: comparative analysis based on CBCT dose calculation with four different margins.
Gill SK; Reddy K; Campbell N; Chen C; Pearson D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):252–262. PubMed ID: 26699581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Co-registration of cone beam CT and planning CT in head and neck IMRT dose estimation: a feasible adaptive radiotherapy strategy.
Yip C; Thomas C; Michaelidou A; James D; Lynn R; Lei M; Guerrero Urbano T
Br J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 87(1034):20130532. PubMed ID: 24288402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric consequences of prostate-based couch shifts on the precision of dose delivery during simultaneous IMRT irradiation of the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes.
Adamczyk M; Piotrowski T; Adamiak E; Malicki J
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 23860339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluations of an adaptive planning technique incorporating dose feedback in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Liu H; Wu Q
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6362-70. PubMed ID: 22149819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the dosimetric influence of interfractional 6D setup error in hypofractionated prostate cancer treated with IMRT and VMAT using daily kV-CBCT.
Shinde P; Jadhav A; Shankar V; Dhoble SJ
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Dec; 53(4):693-703. PubMed ID: 36289030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of PTV margin based on actual accumulated dose for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Wen N; Kumarasiri A; Nurushev T; Burmeister J; Xing L; Liu D; Glide-Hurst C; Kim J; Zhong H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(21):7733-44. PubMed ID: 24140847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Design planning target volumes (PTVs) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Lin CG; Li GW; Lin LW; Wu YQ; Xiao DY; Zhao C; Lu TX; Cui NJ
Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 17298753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative dosimetric study of two strategies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer.
Chen SW; Yang SN; Liang JA; Shiau AC; Lin FJ
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 16275564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate IMRT fluence verification for prostate cancer patients using 'in-vivo' measured EPID images and in-room acquired kilovoltage cone-beam CT scans.
Ali AS; Dirkx ML; Cools RM; Heijmen BJ
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Sep; 8():211. PubMed ID: 24020393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interfractional variation in whole-breast VMAT irradiation: a dosimetric study with complementary SGRT and CBCT patient setup.
Mankinen M; Virén T; Seppälä J; Koivumäki T
Radiat Oncol; 2024 Feb; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 38347554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variable planning margin approach to account for locoregional variations in setup uncertainties.
Yang J; Garden AS; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Dong L
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5136-44. PubMed ID: 22894439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric evaluation of three adaptive strategies for prostate cancer treatment including pelvic lymph nodes irradiation.
Cantin A; Gingras L; Lachance B; Foster W; Goudreault J; Archambault L
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7011-21. PubMed ID: 26632056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
