112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20717187)
1. Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
Chalmers I
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):109-12. PubMed ID: 20717187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
Manning J
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):113-4. PubMed ID: 20720612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
Overton E
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):84. PubMed ID: 20930918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
Richardson A
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):118. PubMed ID: 20720614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Defendants of the Cartwright Inquiry are unable to provide a description of 'adequate care' for cervical carcinoma in situ.
Chalmers I
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1322):85-7. PubMed ID: 20930897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reassessing Cartwright--understanding the factual record.
Bunkle P
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):88-94. PubMed ID: 20927163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective study: response to Dr McCredie. Re: consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):104. PubMed ID: 20927167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient's response to recent criticisms of the findings in the report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry 1988.
Matheson C
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):95-101. PubMed ID: 20927164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. No new evidence on the cervical cancer study.
Paul C; Holloway L
N Z Med J; 1990 Dec; 103(903):581-3. PubMed ID: 2255455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A response to Dr Paul Patten. Re: a particular relationship.
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):102. PubMed ID: 20927165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why did so many women develop cancer? Part 2.
Jones RW
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):106-7; author reply 107-8. PubMed ID: 20717186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical research after Auckland.
Gerber P; Coppleson M
Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 2716616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research into the Cartwright Inquiry.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):114-5. PubMed ID: 19182853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to Ron Jones' letter of 30 April 2010.
Overton H
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):113-5. PubMed ID: 20717188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Toilet of the portio: a reliable technic for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesions].
Blanda A; Gambaro C
Minerva Ginecol; 1987 Oct; 39(10):723-6. PubMed ID: 3431740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Correcting an error but inadequate treatment of cervical cancer still occurred.
Matheson C
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):83. PubMed ID: 20930917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice.
Raffle AE; Gray JAM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():A8-A13. PubMed ID: 32448444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implications for Australia of the New Zealand report of the cervical cancer inquiry: no cause for complacency.
McNeill PM
Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):264-8, 271. PubMed ID: 2716624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
