These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20717188)

  • 1. A response to Ron Jones' letter of 30 April 2010.
    Overton H
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):113-5. PubMed ID: 20717188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
    Chalmers I
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):109-12. PubMed ID: 20717187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The missing manuscript.
    Frizelle FA
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):11-3. PubMed ID: 20717173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 1987 National Women's Hospital (NWH) 'Unfortunate Experiment'. Accusations of unethical experiments and undertreatment, resulting in excess deaths from cervical cancer. Facts and fables.
    Overton GH
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):101-5. PubMed ID: 20717185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congratulations to the NZMJ for the Unfortunate Experiment theme issue.
    Sandercock J; Burls A
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):119-20. PubMed ID: 20720615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterogeneity in CIN3 diagnosis.
    Schiffman M; Rodríguez AC
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):404-6. PubMed ID: 18452848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
    Manning J
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):113-4. PubMed ID: 20720612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
    Overton E
    N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):84. PubMed ID: 20930918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to Elizabeth Overton's comments about Ron Jones' research.
    McCredie M; Jones RW
    N Z Med J; 2010 Dec; 123(1327):160-3. PubMed ID: 21358797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
    Richardson A
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):118. PubMed ID: 20720614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No new evidence on the cervical cancer study.
    Paul C; Holloway L
    N Z Med J; 1990 Dec; 103(903):581-3. PubMed ID: 2255455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Treatment of micro-invasive cervical cancers].
    Boulanger JC; Gondry J; Naepels P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(3 Suppl):191-4. PubMed ID: 9471458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Toilet of the portio: a reliable technic for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesions].
    Blanda A; Gambaro C
    Minerva Ginecol; 1987 Oct; 39(10):723-6. PubMed ID: 3431740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A response to criticisms of The History of the 'Unfortunate Experiment' at National Women's Hospital.
    Bryder L
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):14-21. PubMed ID: 20717174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invasive cervical cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Vaccher E; Tirelli U
    Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9069):1909-10. PubMed ID: 9217774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes for women without conventional treatment for stage 1A (microinvasive) carcinoma of the cervix.
    Paul C; Sharples KJ; Baranyai J; Jones RW; Skegg DC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jun; 58(3):321-329. PubMed ID: 29405269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
    Teng N; Abu-Rustum NR; Bahador A; Bookman MA; Bristow RE; Campos S; Cho KR; Copeland L; Eifel P; Fiorica J; Greer BE; Kapp DS; Kavanagh J; Koh WJ; Kuettel M; Lurain JR; Molpus KL; Nag S; Partridge EE; Powell CB; Reynolds RK; Small W; Soper J; Tillmanns TD;
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):612-30. PubMed ID: 19780304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 66, September 2005. Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):645-64. PubMed ID: 16135610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.