263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718135)
1. Backdoor eugenics: the troubling implications of certain damages awards in wrongful birth and wrongful life claims.
Stein JT
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 40(1):1117-68. PubMed ID: 20718135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Wrongful birth - a step in the right direction?].
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 21321859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A wrongful birth?
Weil E
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Mar; ():48-53. PubMed ID: 16715568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Parents of a handicapped child received compensation for an omitted abortion].
Schell W
Kinderkrankenschwester; 2004 Jan; 23(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 16137076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
Scott R
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The fragile X omen: scientific advances compel a legislative treatment of wrongful life and wrongful birth.
Hackett K
J Law Technol; 1987; 2(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11659197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wrongful life, wrongful birth, and wrongful pregnancy: judicial divergence in the birth-related torts.
DeVries DL; Rifkin AM
Forum; 1985; 20(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic health and eugenics precedents: a voice of caution.
Palmer LI
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 15083830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
Ackmann EA
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wrongful births. When is there liability for prenatal injury?
Fleisher LD
Am J Dis Child; 1987 Dec; 141(12):1260-5. PubMed ID: 3687865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Fitness" for birth and reproduction: legal implications of genetic screening.
Annas GJ; Coyne B
Fam Law Q; 1975; 9(3):463-89. PubMed ID: 11664499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Robak v. United States: a precedent-setting damage formula for wrongful birth.
Leightman CW
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1982; 58(3):725-64. PubMed ID: 11658600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Greco v. United States: a step forward or backward from Roe v. Wade?
Kayne MS
Womens Rights Law Report; 1996; 17(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 11863013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life.
Mayo KL
North Carol Centr Law J; 1985; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. To be or not to be: is that the question? Wrongful life and misconceptions.
Morris A; Saintier S
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):167-93. PubMed ID: 15085815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know.
Shapiro SC
Wash Univ Law Q; 1978; 1978(1):167-210. PubMed ID: 11664983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrongful life and the comparison of harms.
Perry C
Westminst Inst Rev; 1982 Apr; 1(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 11650539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. It's a wonderful life: is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born?
Perry R
Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Nov; 93(2):329-400. PubMed ID: 18354869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New prenatal screening procedures raise spectre of more "wrongful-birth" claims.
Capen K
CMAJ; 1995 Mar; 152(5):734-7. PubMed ID: 7882235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
