These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718206)
21. [The utility of various Doppler parameters at rest and during exercise for the diagnosis of residual stenosis after operation for aortic coarctation. A doppler-nuclear magnetic resonance comparison]. Crepaz R; Knoll P; Paulmichl R; Pitscheider W G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Apr; 28(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 9616851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. Baumgartner H; Stefenelli T; Niederberger J; Schima H; Maurer G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 May; 33(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10334438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients. Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis. Adams JC; Jiamsripong P; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Marupakula V; Heys J; Chaliki HP J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21560814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Subramanyan R; Srinivasan M; Joy J; Tharakan J; Titus T; Venkitachalam CG; Balakrishnan KG Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 2086443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Echocardiographic assessment for surgical treatment in patients with aortic stenosis]. Ota T; Iwahashi K; Kanda H; Sato H; Okada M; Nakamura K J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):447-55. PubMed ID: 1339803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correlation of pediatric echocardiographic Doppler and catheter-derived valvar aortic stenosis gradients and the influence of aortic regurgitation. Wright SB; Wienecke MM; Meyer KB; McKay CA; Wiles HB Am J Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 77(8):663-5. PubMed ID: 8610626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Doppler estimation of pressure gradient in pulmonary stenosis: maximal instantaneous vs peak-to-peak, vs mean catheter gradient. Aldousany AW; DiSessa TG; Dubois R; Alpert BS; Willey ES; Birnbaum SE Pediatr Cardiol; 1989; 10(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 2798190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Lima VC; Zahn E; Houde C; Smallhorn J; Freedom RM; Benson LN Cardiol Young; 2000 Mar; 10(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 10817294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis. Lemler MS; Valdes-Cruz LM; Shandas RS; Cape EG Am J Cardiol; 1999 May; 83(10):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10335760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Currie PJ; Seward JB; Reeder GS; Vlietstra RE; Bresnahan DR; Bresnahan JF; Smith HC; Hagler DJ; Tajik AJ Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 3995710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Correlation of the transaortic gradient determined with doppler echocardiography versus catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis]. Illescas J; Enciso R; Vidrio M; de la Torre N; Baduí E Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1991; 61(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 1854227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of the peak-to-peak pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. Zhang Y; Ihlen H; Nitter-Hauge S Int J Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 10(3):192-212. PubMed ID: 3957467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient in evaluation of children with aortic valve stenosis and comparison to gradient at catheterization. Bengur AR; Snider AR; Serwer GA; Peters J; Rosenthal A Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):756-61. PubMed ID: 2801526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Doppler echocardiography in right and left obstructive cardiopathies]. Izquierdo Riezu M; Pastor Menchaca E; Galdeano Miranda JM; Cabrera Duro A; Modesto Caballero C; Peña Sundheim R An Esp Pediatr; 1991 Apr; 34(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 2069277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of the mean pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. Zhang Y; Nitter-Hauge S Eur Heart J; 1985 Dec; 6(12):999-1005. PubMed ID: 3830713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients. Gjertsson P; Caidahl K; Svensson G; Wallentin I; Bech-Hanssen O Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 88(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11448410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. Smith MD; Dawson PL; Elion JL; Wisenbaugh T; Kwan OL; Handshoe S; DeMaria AN Am Heart J; 1986 Feb; 111(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 3511648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Significance of the Doppler-derived gradient across a residual aortic coarctation. Aldousany AW; DiSessa TG; Alpert BS; Birnbaum SE; Willey ES Pediatr Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 11(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2304885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]