147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718208)
1. Resin composite polyethylene fiber reinforcement: effect on fracture resistance of weakened marginal ridges.
Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 20718208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different onlay systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with and without glass fiber posts.
Salameh Z; Ounsi HF; Aboushelib MN; Al-Hamdan R; Sadig W; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2010 Apr; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 20608297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
