These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Marginal ridge strength of Class II tunnel restorations. Purk JH; Roberts RS; Elledge DA; Chappell RP; Eick JD Am J Dent; 1995 Apr; 8(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7546482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin. Ehrnford LE; Fransson H Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 7871480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. Meiers JC; Kazemi RB; Donadio M J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 12690352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars. Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post. Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Class IV preparation design for microfilled and macrofilled composite resin. Donly KJ; Browning R Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1502113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless anterior teeth restored with composite or porcelain veneers. D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M; Caputi S J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 20003956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]