These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718546)

  • 1. Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.
    Swanton DN; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 20718546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal averaging across multiple response options: insight into the mechanisms underlying integration.
    De Corte BJ; Matell MS
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Mar; 19(2):329-42. PubMed ID: 26520647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes.
    Matell MS; Kurti AN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():80-91. PubMed ID: 23896560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Averaging of temporal memories by rats.
    Swanton DN; Gooch CM; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 19594288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.
    Matell MS; Kim JS; Hartshorne L
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():49-57. PubMed ID: 24012783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous temporal processing.
    Meck WH; Church RM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jan; 10(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6707581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interstimulus interval as a discriminative stimulus: evidence of the generality of a novel asymmetry in temporal discrimination learning.
    Todd TP; Winterbauer NE; Bouton ME
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):412-20. PubMed ID: 20067824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Daily meal anticipation: interaction of circadian and interval timing.
    Terman M; Gibbon J; Fairhurst S; Waring A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():470-87. PubMed ID: 6588809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hippocampus, time, and memory.
    Meck WH; Church RM; Olton DS
    Behav Neurosci; 1984 Feb; 98(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 6696797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of an intruded event on peak-interval timing in rats: isolation of a postcue effect.
    Brown BL; Richer P; Doyère V
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 17161921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement.
    Buriticá J; Alcalá E
    Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simultaneous temporal processing account of response rate.
    Macinnis ML; Marshall AT; Freestone DM; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):506-10. PubMed ID: 20067825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.
    Urushihara K; Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 15043646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
    Holder MD; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal regularity and stimulus control in multiple fixed interval schedules.
    Nepomoceno EB; Cravo AM; Reyes MB; Caetano MS
    Behav Processes; 2020 Feb; 171():104019. PubMed ID: 31846707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of timing theories to a peak procedure.
    Yi L
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 17446012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of signaled reinforcement on response variability.
    Reed P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):286-299. PubMed ID: 36706032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.
    Matell MS; Portugal GS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 17023122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the long anchor duration on performance in the temporal bisection procedure.
    Araiba S; Brown BL
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():76-86. PubMed ID: 27993647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.