These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718547)

  • 1. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The outcome predictability bias is evident in overt attention.
    Griffiths O; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 31070432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting.
    Kruschke JK; Kappenman ES; Hetrick WP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):830-45. PubMed ID: 16248737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
    Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The redundancy effect in human causal learning: No evidence for changes in selective attention.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 28695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive learning, prediction errors, and attention: evidence from event-related potentials and eye tracking.
    Wills AJ; Lavric A; Croft GS; Hodgson TL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):843-54. PubMed ID: 17488208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart.
    Vadillo MA; Castro L; Matute H; Wasserman EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17886193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional mechanisms in learned predictiveness.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; Seetoo J; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 22369199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No two cues are alike: Depth of learning during infancy is dependent on what orients attention.
    Wu R; Kirkham NZ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Oct; 107(2):118-36. PubMed ID: 20627258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Suret MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1468-76. PubMed ID: 17853191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.