These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718555)

  • 1. An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20718555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions.
    Mingote S; Weber SM; Ishiwari K; Correa M; Salamone JD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 21(6):1749-57. PubMed ID: 15845103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interresponse time changes as a function of water deprivation and amphetamine.
    Brown BM; Seiden LS
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 May; 193(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 1142113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response-bout analysis of interresponse times in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():12-21. PubMed ID: 27619956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.
    Reed P; Soh M; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Shek WY
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
    Galbicka G; Platt JR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):432-43. PubMed ID: 25915752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alterations in DRH and DRL performance in rats developmentally exposed to an environmental PCB mixture.
    Sable HJ; Powers BE; Wang VC; Widholm JJ; Schantz SL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2006; 28(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 16930942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of signaled reinforcement on rats' fixed-interval responding.
    Reed P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):367-82. PubMed ID: 12908763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.
    Reed P; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Soh M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 12822684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Schedule discrimination in a mixed schedule: implications for models of the variable-ratio, variable-interval rate difference.
    Silberberg A; Goto K; Hachiga Y; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 18178339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operant behavior of rats under fixed-interval reinforcement schedules: a dynamical analysis via the extended return map.
    Li JS; Krauth J; Huston JP
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2006 Apr; 10(2):215-40. PubMed ID: 16519866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Orduña V; García A; Hong E
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 20060441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.