These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20718574)

  • 1. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: evidence for the role of episodes.
    Thomson DR; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):318-33. PubMed ID: 21264719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task switching under predictable and unpredictable circumstances.
    Andreadis N; Quinlan PT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1776-90. PubMed ID: 20952777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning.
    Braem S; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1662-6. PubMed ID: 21728466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control.
    Hommel B; Fischer R; Colzato LS; van den Wildenberg WP; Cellini C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 22201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control.
    Schlaghecken F; Martini P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 21967273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.