736 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20719298)
1. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pilot study of new focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 20457367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
Kriechbaum K; Findl O; Koeppl C; Menapace R; Drexler W
Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 15745773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry.
Tsorbatzoglou A; Németh G; Máth J; Berta A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1345-50. PubMed ID: 16863973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of accommodation amplitudes in pseudophakic eyes measured with three different methods.
Nemeth G; Tsorbatzoglou A; Vamosi P; Sohajda Z; Berta A
Eye (Lond); 2008 Jan; 22(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16858433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
Alio JL; Simonov A; Plaza-Puche AB; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():37-48. PubMed ID: 26829595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens.
Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T; Charman WN; Cerviño A; Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 18471630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial experience with an accommodating intraocular lens: controlled prospective study.
Hantera MM; Hamed AM; Fekry Y; Shoheib EA
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 20610096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study.
Rocha KM; Soriano ES; Chamon W; Chalita MR; Nosé W
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 17445897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.
Vingolo EM; Grenga P; Iacobelli L; Grenga R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1244-7. PubMed ID: 17586381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification].
Xu M; Li WS; Zhao YE; Wang QM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 43(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17459238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
