BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20721791)

  • 1. Bayesian adaptive dose-finding studies with delayed responses.
    Fu H; Manner D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):1055-70. PubMed ID: 20721791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian optimal adaptive designs for delayed-response dose-finding studies.
    Li W; Fu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):888-901. PubMed ID: 21830921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian adaptive D-optimal design with delayed responses.
    Li J; Fu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 23611195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian dose-finding trial with adaptive dose expansion to flexibly assess efficacy and safety of an investigational drug.
    Berry SM; Spinelli W; Littman GS; Liang JZ; Fardipour P; Berry DA; Lewis RJ; Krams M
    Clin Trials; 2010 Apr; 7(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 20338905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical aspects of the TNK-S2B trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an efficient, dose-adaptive, seamless phase II/III design.
    Levin B; Thompson JL; Chakraborty B; Levy G; MacArthur R; Haley EC
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 21737464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
    Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian decision-theoretic sequential response-adaptive randomization design.
    Jiang F; Jack Lee J; Müller P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):1975-94. PubMed ID: 23315678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial.
    Ohwada S; Morita S
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Sep; 15(5):420-9. PubMed ID: 27485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bayesian dose-finding design adapting to efficacy and tolerability response.
    Padmanabhan SK; Berry S; Dragalin V; Krams M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):276-93. PubMed ID: 22251174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian adaptive dose selection procedure with an overdispersed count endpoint.
    Pozzi L; Schmidli H; Gasparini M; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):5008-27. PubMed ID: 24022748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian Hybrid Adaptive Randomisation Design for Clinical Trials with Survival Outcomes.
    Moatti M; Chevret S; Zohar S; Rosenberger WF
    Methods Inf Med; 2016; 55(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 26404511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An extension of Bayesian predictive sample size selection designs for monitoring efficacy and safety.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):3029-39. PubMed ID: 26038148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?
    Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation.
    Cai C; Liu S; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4017-28. PubMed ID: 24817556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal timing for an accelerated interim futility analysis incorporating real world data.
    Haine LMF; Murray TA; Koopmeiners JS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 May; 140():107489. PubMed ID: 38461938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of patient subpopulations: efficient designs of Phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Berry SM; Broglio KR; Groshen S; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):720-34. PubMed ID: 23983156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.
    Ryan EG; Lamb SE; Williamson E; Gates S
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 31937341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage designs for Phase 2 dose-finding trials.
    Ivanova A; Xiao C; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2872-81. PubMed ID: 22865626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.