These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20723066)

  • 1. Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework.
    Shirk AJ; Wallin DO; Cushman SA; Rice CG; Warheit KI
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3603-19. PubMed ID: 20723066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population structure of spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in a fragmented landscape.
    Purrenhage JL; Niewiarowski PH; Moore FB
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jan; 18(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 19192178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach.
    Braunisch V; Segelbacher G; Hirzel AH
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3664-78. PubMed ID: 20723058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers, Martes pennanti.
    Garroway CJ; Bowman J; Wilson PJ
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Oct; 20(19):3978-88. PubMed ID: 21883589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landscape genetic structure of coastal tailed frogs (Ascaphus truei) in protected vs. managed forests.
    Spear SF; Storfer A
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(21):4642-56. PubMed ID: 19140987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A landscape genetics approach for quantifying the relative influence of historic and contemporary habitat heterogeneity on the genetic connectivity of a rainforest bird.
    Pavlacky DC; Goldizen AW; Prentis PJ; Nicholls JA; Lowe AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(14):2945-60. PubMed ID: 19549110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?
    Lee-Yaw JA; Davidson A; McRae BH; Green DM
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1863-74. PubMed ID: 19302465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations.
    Murphy MA; Dezzani R; Pilliod DS; Storfer A
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3634-49. PubMed ID: 20723055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landscape genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and putative selection gradients in a large-scale estuarine environment.
    McCairns RJ; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3901-16. PubMed ID: 18662229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of multiple dispersal mechanisms and landscape structure on population clustering and connectivity in fragmented artesian spring snail populations.
    Worthington Wilmer J; Elkin C; Wilcox C; Murray L; Niejalke D; Possingham H
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Aug; 17(16):3733-51. PubMed ID: 18643884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the landscape on boreal toad gene flow: does the pattern-process relationship hold true across distinct landscapes at the northern range margin?
    Moore JA; Tallmon DA; Nielsen J; Pyare S
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Dec; 20(23):4858-69. PubMed ID: 22035421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine-scale population structure in a desert amphibian: landscape genetics of the black toad (Bufo exsul).
    Wang IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Sep; 18(18):3847-56. PubMed ID: 19708887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes.
    With KA
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):803-15. PubMed ID: 15357801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landscape genetics of an endangered lemur (Propithecus tattersalli) within its entire fragmented range.
    Quéméré E; Crouau-Roy B; Rabarivola C; Louis EE; Chikhi L
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(8):1606-21. PubMed ID: 20345682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis.
    Spear SF; Balkenhol N; Fortin MJ; McRae BH; Scribner K
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3576-91. PubMed ID: 20723064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban landscape genetics: canopy cover predicts gene flow between white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations in New York City.
    Munshi-South J
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Mar; 21(6):1360-78. PubMed ID: 22320856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population genetics of Mioscirtus wagneri, a grasshopper showing a highly fragmented distribution.
    Ortego J; Aguirre MP; Cordero PJ
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Feb; 19(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 20051009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling.
    Cushman SA; McKelvey KS; Hayden J; Schwartz MK
    Am Nat; 2006 Oct; 168(4):486-99. PubMed ID: 17004220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying past and present connectivity illuminates a rapidly changing landscape for the African elephant.
    Epps CW; Wasser SK; Keim JL; Mutayoba BM; Brashares JS
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(6):1574-88. PubMed ID: 23398457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go?
    Jaquiéry J; Broquet T; Hirzel AH; Yearsley J; Perrin N
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Feb; 20(4):692-705. PubMed ID: 21175906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.