These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20723066)

  • 21. How does farmer connectivity influence livestock genetic structure? A case-study in a Vietnamese goat population.
    Berthouly C; Do Ngoc D; Thévenon S; Bouchel D; Van TN; Danes C; Grosbois V; Thanh HH; Chi CV; Maillard JC
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Oct; 18(19):3980-91. PubMed ID: 19735449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring the population genetic consequences of the colonization process with spatio-temporally explicit models: insights from coupled ecological, demographic and genetic models in montane grasshoppers.
    Knowles LL; Alvarado-Serrano DF
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3727-45. PubMed ID: 20723059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach.
    Coulon A; Cosson JF; Angibault JM; Cargnelutti B; Galan M; Morellet N; Petit E; Aulagnier S; Hewison AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2841-50. PubMed ID: 15315694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Population genetic structure in Myrtus communis L. in a chronically fragmented landscape in the Mediterranean: can gene flow counteract habitat perturbation?
    Albaladejo RG; Carrillo LF; Aparicio A; Fernández-Manjarrés JF; González-Varo JP
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2009 May; 11(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 19470115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Regional gene flow and population structure of the wind-dispersed plant species Hypochaeris radicata (Asteraceae) in an agricultural landscape.
    Mix C; Arens PF; Rengelink R; Smulders MJ; Van Groenendael JM; Ouborg NJ
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jun; 15(7):1749-58. PubMed ID: 16689895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Linking movement behaviour to dispersal and divergence in plethodontid salamanders.
    Lowe WH; McPeek MA; Likens GE; Cosentino BJ
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4459-69. PubMed ID: 18803591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Pérez-Espona S; Pérez-Barbería FJ; McLeod JE; Jiggins CD; Gordon IJ; Pemberton JM
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Feb; 17(4):981-96. PubMed ID: 18261043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Landscape modelling of gene flow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks.
    Dyer RJ; Nason JD; Garrick RC
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3746-59. PubMed ID: 20723052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective dispersal of Florida scrub-jays.
    Coulon A; Fitzpatrick JW; Bowman R; Lovette IJ
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1080-8. PubMed ID: 20151985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using isolation-by-distance-based approaches to assess the barrier effect of linear landscape elements on badger (Meles meles) dispersal.
    Frantz AC; Pope LC; Etherington TR; Wilson GJ; Burke T
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(8):1663-74. PubMed ID: 20345687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The landscape genetics of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in a large fluvial ecosystem.
    Leclerc E; Mailhot Y; Mingelbier M; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(7):1702-17. PubMed ID: 18331242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Seascape genetics along a steep cline: using genetic patterns to test predictions of marine larval dispersal.
    Galindo HM; Pfeiffer-Herbert AS; McManus MA; Chao Y; Chai F; Palumbi SR
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3692-707. PubMed ID: 20723046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Landscape genetics: where are we now?
    Storfer A; Murphy MA; Spear SF; Holderegger R; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3496-514. PubMed ID: 20723061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Disentangling the effects of historic vs. contemporary landscape structure on population genetic divergence.
    Zellmer AJ; Knowles LL
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Sep; 18(17):3593-602. PubMed ID: 19674302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics.
    Cushman SA; Landguth EL
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3592-602. PubMed ID: 20618896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics.
    Epperson BK; McRae BH; Scribner K; Cushman SA; Rosenberg MS; Fortin MJ; James PM; Murphy M; Manel S; Legendre P; Dale MR
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3549-64. PubMed ID: 20618894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interaction of landscape and life history attributes on genetic diversity, neutral divergence and gene flow in a pristine community of salmonids.
    Gomez-Uchida D; Knight TW; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(23):4854-69. PubMed ID: 19878451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grains of connectivity: analysis at multiple spatial scales in landscape genetics.
    Galpern P; Manseau M; Wilson P
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(16):3996-4009. PubMed ID: 22724394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulating natural selection in landscape genetics.
    Landguth EL; Cushman SA; Johnson NA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Mar; 12(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 21951716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Landscape genetics of plants.
    Holderegger R; Buehler D; Gugerli F; Manel S
    Trends Plant Sci; 2010 Dec; 15(12):675-83. PubMed ID: 20940103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.