BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2072329)

  • 1. The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture.
    Mathews MF; Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 2072329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Sadler JP; McKay ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 8809254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Effect of Connector Designs in Implant Tooth-supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Two-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Gowda S; Quadras DD; Sesappa RS; Katapadi V; Kumar L; Kulkarni D; Mishra N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):669-674. PubMed ID: 29959294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report.
    Cohen SR; Orenstein JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 8206560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
    Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of resistance form on attachment strength of resin-retained castings.
    Wilkes PW; Shillingburg HT; Johnson DL
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 2000; 90(3):16-20, 22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 11314309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apparent intrusion of natural teeth under an implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 1403915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrievable cement-retained implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a new technique.
    Pow EH; Wat PY; Chow TW
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 11307557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-supported versus implant-natural-tooth-supported fixed partial dentures.
    English CE
    J Dent Symp; 1993 Aug; 1():10-5. PubMed ID: 8186830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of stress on a fixed partial denture with a blade-vent implant abutment.
    Takahashi N; Kitagami T; Komori T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Aug; 40(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 357711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial-retainer design considerations for zirconia restorations.
    Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Salameh Z
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19907732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.