These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20723869)

  • 1. Is guilt 'likely' or 'not certain'? Contrast with previous probabilities determines choice of verbal terms.
    Juanchich M; Teigen KH; Villejoubert G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 20723869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Directionality of Verbal Probability Expressions: Effects on Decisions, Predictions, and Probabilistic Reasoning.
    Teigen KH; Brun W
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Nov; 80(2):155-190. PubMed ID: 10527815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal probabilities: an alternative approach.
    Teigen HK; Juanchich M; Filkuková P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):124-46. PubMed ID: 23714010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
    Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You say "probable" and I say "likely": improving interpersonal communication with verbal probability phrases.
    Karelitz TM; Budescu DV
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 15053700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communicative functions of directional verbal probabilities: Speaker's choice, listener's inference, and reference points.
    Honda H; Yamagishi K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2141-2158. PubMed ID: 27550640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.
    O'Brien BJ
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1989 Mar; 39(320):98-100. PubMed ID: 2555504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.
    Alison L; Almond L; Christiansen P; Waring S; Power N; Villejoubert G
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):729-48. PubMed ID: 23042647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect's perceived guilt and criminality.
    Dixon JA; Mahoney B
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 14760965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases.
    Bonnefon JF; Villejoubert G
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 16984289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do people really say it is "likely" when they believe it is only "possible"? Effect of politeness on risk communication.
    Juanchich M; Sirota M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1268-75. PubMed ID: 23782394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic discounting in "certain gain-uncertain loss" and "certain loss-uncertain gain" conditions.
    Ostaszewski P; Bialaszek W
    Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 20083171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: the importance of social categorizations and guilt probability.
    van Prooijen JW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):715-26. PubMed ID: 16648197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of presenting imprecise probabilities in intelligence forecasts.
    Dieckmann NF; Mauro R; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 20409043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice strategies in multiple-cue probability learning.
    White CM; Koehler DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):757-68. PubMed ID: 17576152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
    Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.
    Bosworth B; Burtless G; Steuerle E
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(4):74-98. PubMed ID: 11641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.