These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20723932)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of whole mount processing and systematic sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: pathological outcomes and risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Herrell SD; Kordan Y; Wills ML; Shappell SB; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Cookson MS; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1334-40. PubMed ID: 20723932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
    Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.
    Pettus JA; Weight CJ; Thompson CJ; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15201752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features.
    Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is an independent predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Pierorazio PM; Lambert SM; Matsukhani M; Sprenkle PC; McCann TR; Katz AE; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1066-70. PubMed ID: 17784880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
    Han M; Pound CR; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml.
    Makarov DV; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 16813888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
    Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limited value of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Eto H; Hara I
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2005 Apr; 51(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 15912782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.