These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20724404)

  • 1. Importance of accurately identifying disease in studies using electronic health records.
    Manuel DG; Rosella LC; Stukel TA
    BMJ; 2010 Aug; 341():c4226. PubMed ID: 20724404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The electronic medical record in a research institution: competing constituencies in a publish or perish world.
    Elting LS; Rubenstein EB
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Aug; 15(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10135721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Missing patients in general practice; the computerised age-sex register.
    Kerse N; Clark F
    N Z Med J; 1993 Feb; 106(950):67. PubMed ID: 8437770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic patient records in primary care: study has serious flaw.
    Shaw NT
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7415):622; author reply 622. PubMed ID: 12969949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity.
    Lofthus CM; Cappelen I; Osnes EK; Falch JA; Kristiansen IS; Medhus AW; Nordsletten L; Meyer HE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 15718117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.
    Szeto HC; Coleman RK; Gholami P; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11814171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research.
    Friedman DJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2006 Jan; (143):1-83. PubMed ID: 17552126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Electronic medical records should be structured].
    Krüger K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2090-3. PubMed ID: 17717573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of data on influenza vaccination status at four Vaccine Safety Datalink sites.
    Greene SK; Shi P; Dutta-Linn MM; Shoup JA; Hinrichsen VL; Ray P; Nordin JD; Kuckler L; Weintraub ES; Yih WK
    Am J Prev Med; 2009 Dec; 37(6):552-5. PubMed ID: 19944924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic health records, medical research, and the Tower of Babel.
    Kush RD; Helton E; Rockhold FW; Hardison CD
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Apr; 358(16):1738-40. PubMed ID: 18420507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Central registries in health care. Are they reliable?].
    Carlsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Feb; 91(7):582, 587. PubMed ID: 8114593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of hospital-discharge data.
    Patten SB
    Can J Psychiatry; 1999 Mar; 44(2):188-9. PubMed ID: 10097842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standards in electronic health care records: the EADG/BACH paradigm.
    Maskens A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 87():98-101. PubMed ID: 15458045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [SAMDATA--hospital statistics without quality assurance].
    Lund E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jan; 112(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 1553651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Registries are evolving to meet needs of chronically ill patients.
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 2004 May; 16(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 15272574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Electronic medical records concerning patients of an ambulatory venereologic clinic. Background, structure and earlier experiences].
    Lisby S; Petersen CS; Wulf HC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(17):2291-5. PubMed ID: 11989180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of electronic medication reconciliation to establish the predictors of validity of computerized medication records.
    Turchin A; Gandhi TK; Coley CM; Shubina M; Broverman C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1022-6. PubMed ID: 17911870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computerized medical record--a relic from the last century].
    Krakau I; Hassler E
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Apr; 97(17):2087-8. PubMed ID: 10850037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic health records in ambulatory care.
    Mhyre JG
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(17):1849; author reply 1849. PubMed ID: 18949843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.