111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20724607)
1. Cognition research. Investigation leaves field in the dark about a colleague's work.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):890-1. PubMed ID: 20724607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Harvard probe kept under wraps.
Ledford H
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):908-9. PubMed ID: 20725008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions of the year.
Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
Else H
Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaking up science.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Japanese doctor is heading for record number of retracted research papers.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4596. PubMed ID: 22763400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
Smith R
BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Author of retracted BMJ paper is ordered to pay $C1.6m to Canadian broadcaster.
White C
BMJ; 2015 Nov; 351():h6211. PubMed ID: 26577443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Citation of retracted articles: a call for vigilance.
Drury NE; Karamanou DM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):670. PubMed ID: 19161816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Korean stem cell scandal. Schatten: Pitt panel finds 'misbehavior' but not misconduct.
Holden C
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):928. PubMed ID: 16484456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical developments in retraction.
Redman BK; Yarandi HN; Merz JF
J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):807-9. PubMed ID: 18974415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020.
Gaudino M; Robinson NB; Audisio K; Rahouma M; Benedetto U; Kurlansky P; Fremes SE
JAMA Intern Med; 2021 Aug; 181(8):1118-1121. PubMed ID: 33970185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results.
Williams R
Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
