231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20724613)
1. Free journals grow amid ongoing debate.
Kaiser J
Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):896-8. PubMed ID: 20724613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
Banks M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship.
Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP; Albert DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 15652842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific publishing. Opening the books on open access.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5645):550-4. PubMed ID: 14576392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Researchers--offer your findings!].
Karregård C; Ljung R
Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 20-26; 110(12):639-40. PubMed ID: 23614213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Open access publishing.
Rankin JA; Franklin SG
Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jul; 10(7):1352. PubMed ID: 15338570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific publishing. Open access gains support; fees and journal quality deter submissions.
Vogel G
Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6015):273. PubMed ID: 21252322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Open Access and Institutional Repositories: How Should Subscription Journals Respond?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):235-6. PubMed ID: 26204269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public access to biomedical research.
Drazen JM; Curfman GD
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1343. PubMed ID: 15385662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fair-use policies aim to balance access and cost of publishing.
Dylla HF
Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7247):641. PubMed ID: 19494896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who pays for open access?
Doyle H; Gass A; Kennison R
PLoS Biol; 2004 Apr; 2(4):E105. PubMed ID: 15094807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
Beall J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Open access: The true cost of science publishing.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):426-9. PubMed ID: 23538808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open access--pass the buck.
Leptin M
Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6074):1279. PubMed ID: 22422945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic journal access: how does it affect the print subscription price?
Chen FL; Wrynn P; Rieke JL
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Oct; 89(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 11837258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
Moore A
Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
