123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20725008)
1. Harvard probe kept under wraps.
Ledford H
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):908-9. PubMed ID: 20725008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognition research. Investigation leaves field in the dark about a colleague's work.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):890-1. PubMed ID: 20724607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
Callaway E
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
Wada M
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Italian papers on genetically modified crops under investigation.
Abbott A
Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7586):268-9. PubMed ID: 26791701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
Dalton R
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What counts as plagiarism? Harvard president's resignation sparks debate.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2024 Jan; 625(7995):429-430. PubMed ID: 38212619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Refine retraction notices to avoid damaging fallout.
Xu SB; Hu G
Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7949):624. PubMed ID: 36810885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Researcher fails in legal bid to halt expression of concern by journal Diabetes.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h1112. PubMed ID: 25722185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
Fuyuno I
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative results.
Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Misconduct ruling is silent on intent.
Reich ES
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):189-90. PubMed ID: 22972273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Avalanche' of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community.
Viglione G
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):199-200. PubMed ID: 32047306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A major failure of scientific governance.
Smith R; Godlee F
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5694. PubMed ID: 26514391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retracted papers damage work on DNA repair.
Check E
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1015. PubMed ID: 15973373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):283. PubMed ID: 24646974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Japan fails to settle University dispute.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7389):259. PubMed ID: 22422240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
