These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20725038)
61. Cascading rupture of a megathrust. Elliott JL; Grapenthin R; Parameswaran RM; Xiao Z; Freymueller JT; Fusso L Sci Adv; 2022 May; 8(18):eabm4131. PubMed ID: 35507667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Contrasting décollement and prism properties over the Sumatra 2004-2005 earthquake rupture boundary. Dean SM; McNeill LC; Henstock TJ; Bull JM; Gulick SP; Austin JA; Bangs NL; Djajadihardja YS; Permana H Science; 2010 Jul; 329(5988):207-10. PubMed ID: 20616276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Seismic evidence for active underplating below the megathrust earthquake zone in Japan. Kimura H; Takeda T; Obara K; Kasahara K Science; 2010 Jul; 329(5988):210-2. PubMed ID: 20616277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Earthquake dynamics. Supershear rupture in a M(w) 6.7 aftershock of the 2013 Sea of Okhotsk earthquake. Zhan Z; Helmberger DV; Kanamori H; Shearer PM Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6193):204-7. PubMed ID: 25013073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The potential for giant tsunamigenic earthquakes in the northern Bay of Bengal. Cummins PR Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):75-8. PubMed ID: 17805292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Large slip, long duration, and moderate shaking of the Nicaragua 1992 tsunami earthquake caused by low near-trench rock rigidity. Sallarès V; Prada M; Riquelme S; Meléndez A; Calahorrano A; Grevemeyer I; Ranero CR Sci Adv; 2021 Aug; 7(32):. PubMed ID: 34362735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Inter-episodes earthquake migration in the Bohai-Zhangjiakou Fault Zone, North China: Insights from numerical modeling. Shao B; Hou G; Shen J PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251606. PubMed ID: 34010347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Tectonic aspects of the guatemala earthquake of 4 february 1976. Plafker G Science; 1976 Sep; 193(4259):1201-8. PubMed ID: 17837005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Earthquake hazards on the cascadia subduction zone. Heaton TH; Hartzell SH Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4798):162-8. PubMed ID: 17789780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 M w 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake. Delorey AA; Chao K; Obara K; Johnson PA Sci Adv; 2015 Oct; 1(9):e1500468. PubMed ID: 26601289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Frequent observations of identical onsets of large and small earthquakes. Ide S Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7772):112-116. PubMed ID: 31485057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Upper-plate controls on co-seismic slip in the 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Bassett D; Sandwell DT; Fialko Y; Watts AB Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7592):92-6. PubMed ID: 26935698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Cascadia megathrust earthquake rupture model constrained by geodetic fault locking. Li D; Liu Y Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200135. PubMed ID: 33715408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Forearc deformation and great subduction earthquakes: implications for cascadia offshore earthquake potential. McCaffrey R; Goldfinger C Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5199):856-9. PubMed ID: 17813913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Time-advanced occurrence of moderate-size earthquakes in a stable intraplate region after a megathrust earthquake and their seismic properties. Hong TK; Lee J; Park S; Kim W Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13331. PubMed ID: 30190547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]