72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20725967)
1. Soft tissue adaptation to modified titanium surfaces.
Lee S; Goh BT; Wolke J; Tideman H; Stoelinga P; Jansen J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Nov; 95(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 20725967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone response to titanium implants coated with thin sputtered HA film subject to hydrothermal treatment and implanted in the canine mandible.
Ozeki K; Okuyama Y; Fukui Y; Aoki H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 16971742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibition of Ni release from NiTi alloy by hydroxyapatite, alumina, and titanium sputtered coatings.
Ozeki K; Yuhta T; Aoki H; Fukui Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 12883176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subcutaneous tissue response to titanium, poly(ε-caprolactone), and carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite-coated poly(ε-caprolactone) plates: a rabbit study.
Chanchareonsook N; Tideman H; Feinberg SE; Hollister SJ; Jongpaiboonkit L; Kin L; Jansen JA
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Aug; 101(8):2258-66. PubMed ID: 23349120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
Zagury R; Harari ND; Conz MB; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells.
Knabe C; Howlett CR; Klar F; Zreiqat H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bond strength, compositional, and structural properties of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti, ZrO2-coated Ti, and TPS-coated Ti substrate.
Yang Y; Ong JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Mar; 64(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 12579565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early inflammatory response in soft tissues induced by thin calcium phosphates.
Rydén L; Molnar D; Esposito M; Johansson A; Suska F; Palmquist A; Thomsen P
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Sep; 101(9):2712-7. PubMed ID: 23463679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components.
Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Ramaswamy Y; Wu C; Dunstan CR; Hewson B; Eindorf T; Anderson GI; Zreiqat H
Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3192-204. PubMed ID: 19457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological responses to hydroxyapatite surfaces deposited via a co-incident microblasting technique.
O'Hare P; Meenan BJ; Burke GA; Byrne G; Dowling D; Hunt JA
Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 19864018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone bonding to hydroxyapatite and titanium surfaces on femoral stems retrieved from human subjects at autopsy.
Porter AE; Taak P; Hobbs LW; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW; Spector M
Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(21):5199-208. PubMed ID: 15109844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing and in vitro behavior of hydroxyapatite coatings prepared by electrostatic spray assisted vapor deposition method.
Hou X; Choy KL; Leach SE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Dec; 83(3):683-91. PubMed ID: 17530629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on periimplant bone formation. Part II: calcium phosphate coatings.
Schliephake H; Aref A; Scharnweber D; Rösler S; Sewing A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19126106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
