These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Early-tier tests insufficient for GMO risk assessment. Lang A; Lauber E; Darvas B Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):35-6; author reply 36-7. PubMed ID: 17211390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research. Embry MR; Belanger SE; Braunbeck TA; Galay-Burgos M; Halder M; Hinton DE; Léonard MA; Lillicrap A; Norberg-King T; Whale G Aquat Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 97(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20061034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Introduction of risk assessing methodology in Russia]. Chiburaev VI; Selezneva EA Gig Sanit; 2003; (6):17-21. PubMed ID: 14735730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops. Firbank L; Lonsdale M; Poppy G Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):1475-6. PubMed ID: 16333281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel methods for integrated risk assessment of cumulative stressors--results from the NoMiracle project. Løkke H Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20580411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bt crop risk assessment in the Netherlands. Knols BG; Dicke M Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):973-4. PubMed ID: 12949550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JEM spotlight: applications of advanced nanomaterials for environmental monitoring. Foreword. Sadik OA J Environ Monit; 2009 Jan; 11(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 19137135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of bioluminescent dinoflagellates as an environmental risk assessment tool. Lapota D; Osorio AR; Liao C; Bjorndal B Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Dec; 54(12):1857-67. PubMed ID: 17928009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 'Mission control' model taking hold. Balaschak A Occup Health Saf; 2006 Jan; 75(1):28, 31-2, 85. PubMed ID: 16447840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study. Ippolito A; Sala S; Faber JH; Vighi M Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19880159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental exposure scenarios: development, challenges and possible solutions. Ahrens A; Traas TP J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S7-15. PubMed ID: 18000528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals. Greim HA Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 19034432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Threats to environmental safety in the Russian Federation and ways of their reduction]. Kutsenko VV Gig Sanit; 2003; (6):24-6. PubMed ID: 14735732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of toxicity testing for environmental contaminants. Kramer MG; Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Jul; 117(7):A283. PubMed ID: 19654891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management. Moore MN; Depledge MH; Readman JW; Paul Leonard DR Mutat Res; 2004 Aug; 552(1-2):247-68. PubMed ID: 15288556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A spatially-evaluated methodology for assessing risk to a population from contaminated land. Gay JR; Korre A Environ Pollut; 2006 Jul; 142(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 16352380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]