291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20726411)
1. Extracorporeal gastric stapling reduces the incidence of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Crenshaw GD; Shankar SS; Brown RE; Abbas AE; Bolton JS
Am Surg; 2010 Aug; 76(8):823-8. PubMed ID: 20726411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic ischaemic conditioning of the stomach may reduce gastric-conduit morbidity following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Berrisford RG; Veeramootoo D; Parameswaran R; Krishnadas R; Wajed SA
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 36(5):888-93; discussion 893. PubMed ID: 19615914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transthoracic Extracorporeal Gastric Conduit Preparation for Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.
McGuire AL; Gilbert S
Innovations (Phila); 2015; 10(4):236-40; discussion 240. PubMed ID: 26368035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Bizekis C; Kent MS; Luketich JD; Buenaventura PO; Landreneau RJ; Schuchert MJ; Alvelo-Rivera M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):402-6; discussion 406-7. PubMed ID: 16863737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Esophageal conduit necrosis.
Wormuth JK; Heitmiller RF
Thorac Surg Clin; 2006 Feb; 16(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 16696279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression.
Nguyen NT; Slone J; Wooldridge J; Smith BR; Reavis KM; Hoyt D
Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):929-31. PubMed ID: 19886137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Noshiro H; Urata M; Ikeda O; Iwasaki H; Nabae T; Uchiyama A; Nagai E; Tanaka M
Surgery; 2013 Sep; 154(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 23859308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Extent of lymphnode dissection with minimally invasive esophageal resection].
Böttger T; Terzic A; Müller M
Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Dec; 131(6):466-73. PubMed ID: 17206565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis.
Cerfolio RJ; Bryant AS; Hawn MT
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 22910197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy.
Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Completely minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: the preliminary experience of circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil].
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 48(22):1747-50. PubMed ID: 21211459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Esophagectomy and cervical side-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis.
Xin H; Han Z
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Feb; 34(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 19270355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses.
Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
