BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2072677)

  • 1. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups.
    Kempster GB; Kistler DJ; Hillenbrand J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 2072677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types.
    Gaskill CS; Awan JA; Watts CR; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):218-228. PubMed ID: 27241579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual Judgment of Voice Quality in Nondysphonic French Speakers: Effect of Task-, Speaker- and Listener-Related Variables.
    Delvaux V; Pillot-Loiseau C
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):682-693. PubMed ID: 30922738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests.
    Ghio A; Révis J; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23809570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and severity in tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1088-96. PubMed ID: 12546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multidimensional scaling of nasal voice quality.
    Zraick RI; Liss JM; Dorman MF; Case JL; LaPointe LL; Beals SP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 11386484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
    Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and Correlations Between Overall Severity, Roughness and Breathiness in the Perception of Dysphonic Voices: Investigating Cognitive Aspects.
    Ghio A; Revis J; Smithson-Barrière D; Jarzé S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 34452778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.